One of the most hotly contested debates surrounding the 2013 Notre Dame football team leapt once more to the forefront of conversation Monday as team leaders and representatives from student government met to finalize the players’ decision to sing the Alma Mater after every home game, regardless of outcome.“The fact that this decision was not made by football players alone or by the students alone is a testament to how unified we can be as a student body,” Irish sophomore receiver Corey Robinson said. “The Alma Mater is as an avenue where we can stand together as a unified body and celebrate our common bond: love for Notre Dame.”Observer File Photo Robinson and Irish senior cornerback Matthias Farley represented the Unity Council, a group of football players elected from all class years that acts as liaison between the team and its coaching staff, Robinson said. They met with student body president Lauren Vidal, vice president Matthew Devine and Campus Ministry representative Grace Carroll, all seniors.Robinson, who also represents athletics in student government, said the Unity Council voted unanimously to sing the Alma Mater after every game, a decision that was “nearly unanimously” supported by the team as a whole and reflected the team’s desire to continue a relationship of mutual respect with fans in the student section and beyond.“We were really thinking of the entirety of Notre Dame nation when we made the decision,” Robinson said. “We chose to sing because we appreciate that it’s bigger than just us football players, even us students.“The bottom line is the Notre Dame community is a family,” he said. “Regardless of whether we are celebrating a win or grieving a loss, the most important thing is that we stay together. I can think of no better way to demonstrate this unconditional bond then singing the Alma Mater together after every home game.”The Unity Council made its decision independent of Irish coach Brian Kelly and Director of Athletics Jack Swarbrick, Robinson said. He said Kelly, Swarbrick and the coaching staff “encouraged” him to collaborate with student government in a “joint student effort” to address the issue.“Coach Kelly, his staff and Jack Swarbrick empowered us to make the decision as players,” Robinson said. “They were in communication with us throughout the decision making process and supported our decision as a team.”Farley said the team’s ability to freely determine this season’s Alma Mater policy demonstrated the commitment of players, coaches and administrators to honor the tradition as a way of connecting student-athletes to their peers.“I … think it’s incredible that Coach Kelly and Jack Swarbrick allowed us to make the decision for ourselves,” Farley said. “In my opinion, it makes the decision to continue singing the Alma Mater much more genuine and real coming from the team, especially when there could have been a lot of division amongst us.”Vidal, Devine and Carroll presented Robinson and Farley with a booklet containing student opinions on the Alma Mater to keep the players informed of their peers’ perspectives, Vidal said.“The books contain about 100 quotes from the students — each quote represents that student’s interpretation of the alma mater and what it means to them and our University,” she said.The statements in the booklet mirrored the enthusiasm for the tradition that Robinson and Farley expressed, often lauding the Alma Mater as a symbolic reminder of the values and community within the University as a whole.“Notre Dame values family, faith and community,” senior Shannon Hagedorn said in the booklet. “The players on the team are part of the family and the score at the end of a game played on a Saturday in the fall doesn’t change that fact.“… The Alma Mater is a symbol of our connection, our spirit and our strength in the light and in the dark. Allow the players to sing and sway with their brothers at the end of the day. We belong together.”Senior Kristen Parkinson, president of the Leprechaun Legion, likened the Alma Mater to “a celebration of the Notre Dame family.”“The Legion welcomes the return of this tradition, and we look forward to standing as a united student body, on- and off-the-field, on Saturday,” she said in an email.Controversy surrounding the singing of the Alma Mater first arose after several players left the field of Notre Dame Stadium following the team’s loss to Oklahoma on Sept. 28 without stopping at the student section to sing. The action sparked intense debate among students, alumni and fans, many of whom saw the former policy as equating community with winning alone.“To my understanding, the official policy last season was to not sing the Alma Mater after home losses,” Robinson said. “It was an issue that may have even been decided much earlier than last year, but since we hadn’t lost at home in two years, the policy was not well-known or practiced.”In a press conference Tuesday, Kelly said he raised the issue with the Unity Council and invited its members to revisit the policy.“I addressed it last year with the Unity Council,” he said. “We decided as a team that’s not what we wanted to do. This year we brought it back up to the Unity Council, and they voted that’s something that they wanted to do, so I’m all for what my team wants to do, and we will make that work.”Robinson said some players had expressed concern regarding previous incidents of students booing the team and throwing objects on the field, such as frozen marshmallows during the Nov. 23 game against BYU.“We understand that this is a intense game, but we hope to be treated with respect when we sing the Alma Mater with the student body and fans,” he said.Farley said the Unity Council primarily sought to promote “the respect of both the team for the fans and the fans for the team.”“I would hope that the student body will understand, just as we have, that the singing of the Alma Mater is bigger than all of us and really bonds us together,” he said. “I know that I can speak on the behalf of the team, and there won’t be any behavior issues on our part.”Tags: Alma mater, Brian Kelly, Corey Robinson, football, Jack Swarbrick, Lauren Vidal, Matthew Devine, Matthias Farley
By Marcos Ommati/Diálogo August 18, 2016 nueva agenda? The 2016 South American Defense Conference (SOUTHDEC) started on a different and, unfortunately, sad note on August 17th in Montevideo, Uruguay. A minute of silence was observed in honor of Uruguayan Air Force Captain Fernando Martín De Rebolledo and 2nd Lieutenant Gonzalo Correa, both of whom died a day prior in a tragic accident involving a military helicopter close to Montevideo’s Carrasco International Airport. Right after, Army General Nelson Eduardo Pintos González, Uruguayan Chief of Defense Staff, inaugurated the conference by explaining how the role of the military in his country has recently changed. “In 2015, the Uruguayan Military Policies for Defense established a more robust participation of our Armed Forces in activities such as disaster relief that benefit our population, since there’s no foreseen armed conflict among our regional nations. Of course, this can never interfere with the main and original role of our military, which is national defense.” U.S. Navy Admiral Kurt Tidd, commander of U.S. Southern Command Commander (SOUTHCOM) followed his Uruguayan counterpart to address military and civilian leaders from eight other nations, as well as representatives from the Inter-American Defense Board (IADB), the Center for Hemispheric Defense Studies (CHDS), the Inter-American Defense College (IADC), and other institutions and authorities who were in Montevideo to discuss security and defense issues from August 16th – 18th. “Why is that role changing?” Adm. Tidd asked the audience in reference to the conference’s theme, Changing the Role of the Military in the Region. “To start with, I think we’d all agree that the global security environment is the most complex, volatile, and unpredictable in at least the last half-century – certainly longer than any of us have been on active service. We’re no longer simply dealing with conventional conflicts that displace millions of people and destabilize entire regions — we’re also facing complex, networked threats like transregional crime and violent extremism that transcend borders and boundaries,” he said. Both Adm. Tidd and Gen. Pintos agree that these challenges don’t just blur the lines between domestic security and defense — they transcend geographic borders, hemispheres, and domains. During their opening remarks, they mentioned that these challenges, especially transnational organized crime and humanitarian aid and disaster relief efforts, require more than just multinational cooperation; they require a broader understanding of the complex global environment and demand adaptive and creative responses by re-conceptualized security forces. After their remarks, SOUTHDEC 2016 participants from Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, and the United States walked across the street with Gen. Pintos and Adm. Tidd to the gravesite of Uruguayan national military hero and leader José Gervasio Artigas Arnal, considered the father of Uruguayan nationhood. Both leaders honored him with flowers, before the defense authorities went back to carry on with the conference. During the conference, participants exchanged ideas on the evolution of the role of militaries in maintaining international peace and stability under the United Nations mandate, the role of women in the military, the partner nations’ support to peacekeeping missions, and how to effectively run transregional threat networks for security missions in the future. Both Adm. Tidd and Gen. Pintos have previously stressed the importance of continuing cooperative partnerships to ensure the successful execution of future peacekeeping missions and to maintain stability throughout the region. SOUTHDEC has always had the objective of creating a place for military chiefs to discuss subjects that have a direct influence on the region, thereby achieving an increased level of understanding, friendship, and cooperation in the defense area. This year’s conference is no different.